Official Online Poll: Chinese Want Democracy

Official Online Poll: Chinese Want Democracy

With China’s new leadership now set, Chinese Web users have turned their attention to answering the key question: “What’s next?” In concert with the 18th Party Congress, the website of Communist Party-sanctioned Peoples’s Daily  asking Web users about their hopes for future development. The poll asked users to vote for the topics they cared about most, picking one from a menu which included “Democracy,” “economic development,” “national defense,” “cultural prosperity,” “peace and unity,” “building the Communist Party,” and “international relations.”

The winner? Democracy, in a landslide. Out of a healthy 187,000-plus votes cast, democracy ranked first with over 61,000. This was followed by anti-corruption, which garnered over 38,000 votes, then “social livelihood” with more than 33,000. Although economic development has been the focus of much of China’s policy-making in recent years, that concern ranked a distant fourth.

Of course, this was far from a scientific survey. Determined users could vote for the same option multiple times; nonetheless, in the absence of more traditional democratic means, the poll is a powerful gauge of public opinion. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that this poll was held by a news organization traditionally known to hew to the Party line, and the poll’s affiliation with the 18th Party Congress was emblazoned in bold red across the top of the screen.

People’s Daily Online
Poll results

It’s a bold move by the Party-controlled media, although it only displays the poll results and voter comments are few and far between. But the poll’s results were widely shared on Sina Weibo, China’s Twitter. When famous investor and commentator Kai-Fu Lee, (@) posted the results, they attracted over 800 comments, serving as an ad hoc discussion platform about China’s future.

Some users were surprised by how far the poll went, especially because it was hosted by a state media outlet (albeit one that has a ). @ commented: “[This post is] Surprisingly open and transparent; astonished.” @ wrote, “Hoho, can’t believe it’s” @joked: “It’s truly from; now [it’s] safe to repost.”

Some worried aloud whether the poll’s seemingly clear results would ever reach decision-makers. @ wrote, “I voted for democracy too, hopefully the Big Seven [China’s Politburo Standing Committee] will hear the people’s voice”. @ joked bitterly: “Chairman Xi is too busy to surf online, or to check weibo. Just drop the idea, folks.”

Others were more hopeful that new leader Xi Jinping and his colleagues might take the results to heart. @ commented, “Mr. Xi, it’s your turn now”; @ adds: “The new leader is standing at a crossroads; a middling approach is no longer an option for him”. Another commentator boldly wrote, “With globalization deepening, American-style democracy will lead human development in the 22nd century. … Obama’s passionate [victory] speech [which resonated deeply in China’s blogosphere] has stirred public emotions. Chairman Xi, you have been pushed to the cusp.”

But Web users seemed largely aware that even if Xi were to step across the Rubicon separating democracy from one-party rule, he would have to tread carefully. @ commented: “Political reforms cannot come in a rush. Step by step. A bit of carelessness would draw us back to the historical cycle practiced by so many Dynasties in the past 5000 years.”  @ agreed wholeheartedly: “The sequence for problem solving should be exactly reversed. While carefree social elites are chatting about democracy, 800 million people at the bottom barely able to cover food and clothing need economic development.”

The People’s Daily decision to run this poll, obviously sanctioned by Chinese authorities, is a bold move. But it does not occur in isolation; recently, Weibo posts have flooded in with expectations for China’s new leadership. Liberal intellectuals, who often set the tone for certain quarters of public opinion, have been vocal and their posts have been widely shared. This trend perhaps began with Liu Shengjun (@), an economist and columnist for the Chinese language edition of the Financial Times and Caixin. On November 15, he posted on Weibo his “ten biggest wishes for the next ten years.” They included “not having to buy infant milk powder abroad,” an end to worsening environmental pollution, an end to the emigration of rich officials and rich entrepreneurs, and the hope that “the stock market is transformed from a money misappropriation machine to a value-creating arena.”

Power bloggers Li Chengpeng (@) and Xue Manzi (@) soon followed suit with their own posts to help set the online agenda. Many Weibo users have applauded these efforts, but some question their feasibility. @ exhorted: “Wake up! Wake up!” @ wrote, “Hope is plump but reality is skinny … to achieve all these … is really hard.”

Such posts are part and parcel of the resurgence of Internet liberals following China’s leadership transition, although a separate online debate has also recently heated up between Chinese liberals and conservatives. Ultimately, however, history will only record the real impacts of such arguments. It still not clear if Sina Weibo is in fact pushing the limits of free speech, or just functioning as an outlet for reformists (or worse, a false front for free speech to quell public anger). As Li Chengpeng concluded upon his return after being silenced during the leadership transition:

“Back to Weibo; so excited to make wishes for the next ten years: lower prices, less corrupted officials, more social benefits, narrower wealth gap, more opportunities for the youth … just realized that new governments have said all these; back to decade, two decades ago, these have also be promised. So my message for the next ten years: Realize the promises made during the meeting. Even if only two of them come to fruition, we would be very happy.”


This story by Rachel Wong was originally published by .





‘Personal Media’ in China Takes a Hit From Pre-Publication Censorship

Hu Yong
Observers have long thought that Chinese authorities censor the media depending on type: the censorship of traditional media is primarily conducted in advance, with a thorough inspection of news and discussion before publication; new media, in...



Pulitzer’s ‘Lookout on the Bridge’ vs. China’s ‘News Ethics Committees’

David Bandurski
In a recent harangue on the imperative of better journalism, a website run by the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Propaganda Department tore a jagged page from the wisdom of American newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer: “A journalist is the...



China Censors Online Outcry After ISIS Execution

Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian from Tea Leaf Nation
On November 18, the Islamic State (IS) released photos of what it claimed were two executed hostages. The photos, appearing in the terrorist group’s English-language magazine Dabiq, depict two men with bloodied faces, the word “executed” emblazoned...



Chinese Students in America: 300,000 and Counting

Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian from Tea Leaf Nation
In 1981, when Erhfei Liu entered Brandeis University as an undergraduate, he was only the second student from mainland China in the school’s history. “I was a rare animal from Red China,” Liu said in a September 1 interview with Foreign Policy, “an...



The Real Reason for China’s Two-Child Policy: Millions of New Consumers

from Tea Leaf Nation
Two fictitious Chinese brothers are born in Tuanjiehu Maternity Hospital in the Chinese capital of Beijing. Let’s say the first was born already, in late 2015; his parents nickname him Laoda, meaning “oldest child.” That’s because they have hopes...



Good Journalist, Bad Journalist

David Bandurski
As China marked its annual Journalists’ Day over the weekend, proclaiming the importance of “correct news ideals,” even jaded New Yorkers stopped in their tracks and took notice. How could they not? The message beamed over 7th Avenue on Times Square...



Watch Frank Underwood Advertise China’s Black Friday

Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian from Tea Leaf Nation
On November 11, at the stroke of midnight Beijing time, millions of Chinese sitting behind their computers or cradling their mobile phones began purchasing cell phones, handbags, and clothing at cutthroat prices. By the end of November 11, analysts...



Chinese Hits Miss Out on the Global Box Office

Jonathan Landreth from China Film Insider
If he’d had the time after meeting American captains of industry in Seattle and Barack Obama at the White House, Chinese President Xi Jinping might have ducked out at the close of his United Nations appearance and into a New York movie theater to...



Can the China Model Succeed?

Daniel A. Bell, Timothy Garton Ash, Andrew J. Nathan, Taisu Zhang, Mark Danner, Orville Schell
Is this a new model? Is authoritarian capitalism, Leninist capitalism, something that has durability? Have the rules changed about how countries develop? That used to be, remember, that open markets led ineluctably to open societies. How does it...



‘A Brutality Born of Helplessness’

Alexa Olesen from Tea Leaf Nation
When China finally scrapped its one-child policy after more than three decades of brutality, almost no one lamented its passing. But Paul R. Ehlich, a Stanford-educated biologist and author of the 1968 fear-baiting classic The Population Bomb, was...