breadcrumb

What Can China and Japan Do to Start Anew?

What Can China and Japan Do to Start Anew?

A ChinaFile Conversation

Paula S. Harrell:

While the media keeps its eye on the ongoing Diaoyu/Senkaku islands dispute, heating up yet again this week after Chinese naval ships and aircraft were spotted circling the area, a parallel, possibly game-changing development in China-Japan relations has gone largely unreported: the recent increase in collaboration between the world’s second and third largest economies in a host of science, technology, and business fields, Nationalist rhetoric aside, at the level of pragmatic action, the logic for partnership has never been stronger.

This is not to downplay the seriousness of simmering tensions, as Japan “nationalizes” the islands by purchasing them from a private owner. Although it’s true that anti-Japanese protests in China are nothing new and that carefully managed nationalism has been a staple of China’s Japan policy for decades, 2013 presents a more dangerous picture. The stakes are higher. As a newly strong China projects its power outward into the East China and South China seas, the rocks at the end of the Okinawa archipelago—called Diaoyu in Chinese and Senkaku in Japanese—have assumed outsized importance due to their strategic location and proximity to potential reserves of undersea oil and gas. Disputing Japan’s sovereignty over the islands as China has done recently raises to a new order of magnitude longstanding friction between the two sides over issues of history and war responsibility. With air and sea provocations now increasingly part of the equation, observers quite rightly warn that a local incident could spiral out of control even as cooler heads examine the justice of conflicting territorial claims through the lens of international law. Taking the long view, Cui Tiankai, China’s new ambassador to the U.S., says that “the fundamental problem is whether Japan can accept China’s expanding new strength.” The U.S. answer to the same question lies in the “yes, with reservations” tone of its “Pivot to Asia” policy. Meeting in Hawaii in late March, U.S. and Japanese officials outlined a joint defense plan aimed to push back against China’s new assertiveness in the East China Sea.

Analysis of the economic impact of the ongoing territorial crisis has drawn a lot of attention and produced a mixed balance sheet. When Diaoyu/Senkaku-related anti-Japanese protests broke out in China in August and September of 2012, commentators were quick to tag Japanese business the clear loser. True, Japanese car sales in China plummeted some forty percent by year-end with significant declines also in sales of Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, and Sanyo home appliance products. Although recovery has started in these sectors—auto sales show modest gains and air purifiers, not surprisingly, are selling exceptionally well—other areas appear stagnant. Japan’s tourism industry has yet to reverse the downward trend in Chinese visitors to Japan triggered by the dispute.

But there have been negative consequences for China as well. Anti-Japanese protests and boycotts have convinced many Japanese companies to accelerate plans to shift production operations from China to Southeast Asia, a shift already under way in response to increasing wage demands from Chinese workers. Potential loss of jobs is significant. Toyota alone employs around 30,000 Chinese workers in its factories in China. Analysts appeared generally unconcerned about the impact on China of the dip in Japanese Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) that occurred in 2012. Indeed, July 2013 reporting shows a rebound in FDI figures, including from Japan. Still, it’s worth bearing in mind that any pullback of Japanese investment over the long term, whether for political or economic reasons, could work to China’s detriment, denying Chinese businesses the technological and managerial expertise of Japanese companies with global reach and experience—and this just at a critical time in China’s own push to develop innovative technologies that are globally scalable.

—This blog post is the top of Harrell's essay, “The Urgency of Partnership,” the rest of which can be read here.

 

Comments

If China and Japan let the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands (the Senkakusto Japanese) escalate into a war, it will be a colossal mistake and disaster for both nations. In general, I believe leaders in both countries, despite great pressure from nationalistic elements and domestic politics, have the wisdom not to let this happen.

I don’t worry about Japanese firms’ potential withdrawal from China due to occasional anti-Japanese protests. China’s fast-growing market of 1.3 billion people is something multinationals—Japanese, American and European alike—cannot afford to ignore.

I agree with Paula that the good things happening between China and Japan are not covered by the media. For example, Japanese comics, fashion, cars, home appliances and foods are popular in China.

However, misunderstanding abounds between the two nations. The low favorability expressed towards each other by citizens of both nations is especially disturbing, indicating that cultural and people-to-people exchanges are lacking.

The last Japanese movie and TV series I watched in China were in the 1980s when actor Ken Takakura, now 82-years-old, became an icon among Chinese. Many Japanese books were translated into Chinese in those days. Party chief Hu Yaobang invited 3,000 Japanese youth to visit China in 1984.

These helped many Chinese understand that modern Japan is different from the one shown in WWII movies about Japanese atrocities. Such an aggressive introduction of Japanese culture, sadly, has not been seen in the past two decades.

Hopefully the naming of Chinese director Chen Kaige as the jury president of the Tokyo International Film Festival in October will help bring back Japanese films and TV series back to Chinese screens.

While Japan learned a lot from China during its many dynasties, China also learned a lot from Japan in the areas of technology and management in the 1980s, something China should continue to advocate publicly in its next stage of development.

News organizations in both countries have also done a poor job, with some cashing in on the nationalistic sentiment and adding fuel to fire in the maritime territorial disputes. Unfortunately, that kind of coverage boosts ratings and readership.

I do feel that Japanese have to show more sincerity in their apology for what they did in WWII. Many Japanese politicians have used half-hearted words such as “regret” to express apology for war crimes.

Although more people-to-people exchange will be the most consequential, political leaders in both countries should take the lead in looking at the big picture and making China and Japan good neighbors.

Paula S. Harrell (Ph.D., Columbia University) is a China-Japan historian specializing in nineteenth and twentieth century history and contemporary economic development. In addition to research and...
Chen Weihua is a columnist and chief Washington correspondent for China Daily and the Deputy Editor of China Daily USA. He was a Knight Fellow at Stanford University from 2004 to 2005, a World Press...

Share

Share/Save

Conversation

07.20.16

How Should the Republican Party Approach China Policy?

Peter Navarro, Patrick Chovanec & more
On Tuesday, delegates to the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, chose Donald J. Trump as their nominee for President of the United States. We asked a range of contributors how the Republican Party should approach China policy.

Conversation

07.12.16

China’s Claims in the South China Sea Rejected

Andrew S. Erickson, Peter Dutton & more
On Tuesday in the Hague, the Permanent Court of Arbitration rejected China’s claims that a scattering of rocks and reefs in the contested South China Sea qualify as Exclusive Economic Zones for China. The court found in favor of the Philippines’...

Conversation

07.08.16

Why Is There So Much Talk of China’s Bleeding Money?

Arthur R. Kroeber & Thilo Hanemann
China has seen its foreign reserves depleted for months, but economists don’t agree about why: Is it because Chinese people are buying offshore assets, such as real estate? Because Chinese companies are paying down their foreign debt? Or both? Or is...