A New China Website Helps Dissertations Find Readers

A New China Website Helps Dissertations Find Readers

Dissertations dominate the lives of doctoral students. A PhD candidate spends years researching, writing, and editing his or her dissertation, inching toward the day when the whole process is finished. Finally, he or she can leave behind the nagging designation “ABD” (All But Dissertation) and breathe a sigh of relief. The dissertation is done. 

And then ... nobody reads it.

Well, a few people will read it: advisors, potential employers, and maybe a couple of curious family members who wonder what the many years of graduate school have yielded. But the people who should be first in line to get a copy—other graduate students and scholars—might not even know of the dissertation’s existence. If they do, they will still most likely wait for the work to come out in book form, five to ten years down the line, before reading it. In some respects, this makes sense: books have been thoroughly edited and are generally much more pleasant to read than dissertations, which tend to be highly academic and dense. However, paying more attention to new books than new dissertations means that there’s a lag in academia, a window of time between dissertation and book (and keep in mind that not all dissertations become books, for various reasons) when the young scholar’s work is known to only a small circle of advisors and colleagues.

Stanford University professor Tom Mullaney, a historian of modern China, is trying to diminish that lag through an ambitious project, the . Launched in 2010 as Chinese History Dissertation Reviews, the site has expanded quickly and now includes sections on Japan, Korean, and Science Studies, with plans to add another ten fields later in 2012. Mullaney and four Field Editors work together to identify recently defended dissertations, then match those with suitable reviewers (who range from ABD graduate students to junior faculty). The reviewer prepares a non-critical evaluation of the dissertation, which is posted at the Dissertation Reviews website, as well as a private review letter with suggestions for revision sent directly to the dissertation’s author. The rationale behind only publishing friendly reviews, Mullaney explained, is the recognition that a dissertation is still a work in progress, the first draft of the book manuscript to come. “They’re not books, they’re not finished products, and therefore they shouldn’t be treated as finished products,” he said, so the manner in which they are presented to the public needs to be different from the type of book review one would expect to find in an academic journal.

A quick glance at the China section of the Dissertation Reviews website reveals the wide range of topics that doctoral students have tackled in recent years. While the anti-capitalist ideology of Mao Zedong’s Communist Party has long been taken at face value, for example, Christopher Leighton’s dissertation on explores the surprising integration of capitalists into Shanghai’s post-1949 socialist government. The Ming-Qing transition period is a familiar topic to all who have gone through a graduate seminar in Chinese history, but Ying Zhang is the first to bring gender analysis into the discussion through her work on While many of the dissertations reviewed share a focus on Buddhism, they differ greatly in the specific topics under discussion: ; ; ; and . And the history of public health in Mao’s China—something that has barely been touched by scholars to date—receives thorough treatment in Miriam Gross’s dissertation,

By focusing the site on recently defended dissertations, Mullaney and the other Dissertation Reviews editors hope to widen the circle of scholarship that current graduate students relate their own work to as they develop dissertation projects. Students often think of themselves primarily as consumers of books, but that academic publishing suffers from a “false now,” created by the lengthy process of researching, writing, and editing a monograph. By the time a book hits the shelves, he explains, “What is ‘now’ to the academic consumer is often ‘then’ to the author.” So for graduate students learning to regard themselves as fellow producers of scholarship, not just consumers, sitting back and waiting for new publications to appear cannot be enough. Instead, they must find ways to keep abreast of the latest research in their fields.

Dissertation Reviews helps spread the word, and Mullaney has already heard of new collaborative relationships and conference panels that have developed as junior colleagues become aware of each other’s research through the site. For dissertation authors, having their work appear at Dissertation Reviews can also prove beneficial as they move toward producing a book manuscript; comments from reviewers are intended to help authors refine their dissertations and prepare them for publication.

Ultimately, Mullaney and the other Dissertation Reviews editors hope to bring the dissertation out of its hiding spot in university archives and encourage both graduate students and faculty to spend more time thinking about the place of dissertations in academia. And if their site succeeds, they’ll offer new doctoral recipients a welcome gift: an audience of readers for that dissertation that was so long in the making.

Maura Elizabeth Cunningham is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of History at the University of California, Irvine and ChinaFile Fellow at the Center on U.S.-China Relations. She is Editor of The...



Out of School


Politics and the Chinese Language

Perry Link
The awarding of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature to the Chinese novelist Mo Yan has given rise to energetic debate, both within China’s borders and beyond. Earlier this month, ChinaFile ran an essay by Chinese literature scholar Charles Laughlin...

Out of School


What Mo Yan’s Detractors Get Wrong

Charles Laughlin
When Chinese novelist Mo Yan accepted the Nobel Prize in Literature earlier this week, the relationship between literature and politics attracted much attention. The award is often given to writers who forcefully oppose political repression. When...

Out of School


Heirs of Fairness?

Taisu Zhang
An unusual debate on what may seem an arcane topic—China’s imperial civil service examinations—recently took place on the op-ed page of the The New York Times. The argument centered on the question of whether or not China during the past 1000 years...

Out of School


Refresher Course: The Silk Road

Valerie Hansen
The “Silk Road” was a stretch of shifting, unmarked paths across massive expanses of deserts and mountains—not a real road at any point or time. Archeologists have found few ancient Silk Road bridges, gates, or paving stones like those along Rome’s...

Out of School


The Rehabilitation of Pearl Buck

Peter Conn
In the summer of 1934, Pearl Buck boarded a ship in Shanghai that was bound for America. She was forty-two years old, and had lived for thirty-four of those years in China, mostly in cities along the Yangzi River. Pearl and her first husband, John...

Out of School


France’s Baccalauréat Sparks Debate on Chinese Education

Bi Cheng
What does one gain by working?Are all beliefs contrary to reason?Comment on an excerpt of Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise Do we have a duty to seek the truth?Would we be freer without the state?Explicate an excerpt of Émile by Jean-...

Out of School


Review: “The Revolutionary”

Jeffrey Wasserstrom
The Revolutionary, a new documentary that has begun showing on university campuses and at cultural centers, looks at the life of Sidney Rittenberg, a ninety-year-old man who has had an extraordinary variety of experiences. Born into a well-to-do...

Out of School


In the Journals: Journal of Asian Studies, February 2012

Maura Cunningham
The February 2012 issue of the Journal of Asian Studies opens with a trio of short articles exploring major trends in China-related publishing over the past decade. The essays, which differ widely in topic, are connected by a concern with how...

Out of School


Re-Reading: The Good Earth

Maura Cunningham
The Good Earth simultaneously manages to be both a classic and not very good. This is not, I trust, a controversial statement: Pearl Buck’s 1931 novel suffered a mixed reputation from the start. While many early readers hailed her work for its...

Out of School


Chinese Law: Using the Past to Escape the Present

Glenn D. Tiffert
Amid the skyscrapers, bullet trains and brio of contemporary China, the Mao era may seem remote. Discussions of Chinese law, for instance, typically consign it to a squib if they acknowledge it at all. But this is a grave mistake. Legal reformers...